Everyone should believe in Brentopia...

Wednesday, May 27, 2009

Review: Sushi O (Midlothian, Virginia)

Below is the text of a review I originally posted to Yelp.com, and it relates to a dinner experience on my girlfriend's (age-redacted) birthday. She loves sushi, and I'm happy to oblige her at the local "bait shops." People do crazy things for the people they love.

Before reading the review, note that I have no relationship with Sushi O, its employees, agents, its competitors and/or competitor employees/agents. Further, I do not hold, nor held, any ill will toward Sushi O, and the details relayed below are an honest accounting of my experiences and should be interpreted strictly as personal opinion. Further, I intend no harm to the Sushi O organization, its employees or agents.

And as one should surely expect with any review, your individual mileage may vary.

-------------------------
Original review appears here: http://www.yelp.com/biz/sushi-o-midlothian#hrid:DJcKaea6ExXfMLqcAvuEmg


It appears that I will be the first to review this restaurant at any level short of perfection; indeed, my experience at Sushi-O (Midlothian, Virginia) was certainly less than perfect, and I take no pleasure in what I am about to report.

We arrived roughly 90-minutes before closing time (10PM on Weekdays) and were seated promptly in an empty dining room. At that time, there were a few bar flies drinking and watching basketball on the bar's 40" LCD, but my girlfriend and I were otherwise alone. And as the boyfriend to a woman who greatly appreciates sushi, I've eaten in all of the sushi establishments in Richmond, and VERY few are THIS quiet. The lack of activity here certainly doesn't indicate a rosy future for this establishment, which is unfortunate for the owners, but also could be seen as an indicator for the quality of the food and the relative pricing thereof.

Let me state up front here -- Sushi O is expensive, and a quick glance at their menu will show their pricing is between 20-50% higher than equivalent sushi restaurants in our area.

Generally speaking, consumers can accept some hike in price when it can be attributed to a restaurant's atmosphere and hard-working wait staff, but that's a stretch here. In the latter respect, we report that we did have much trouble attracting the attention of the wait staff during our meal -- Why? They were all gathered at the bar, watching basketball on the TV. Now, perhaps the basketball game on the TV was a nail-biter, but its hard to excuse a wait staff from their responsibilities to paying customers on the account of basketball, particularly at a restaurant where the entrees can cost upwards of $30/plate. Really, watch the game on your own time and dime, and at least present the illusion that your customer's are worth your efforts by filling their water glasses occasionally. Poor form.

I also report that the food at Sushi O is somewhat lacking.

Priced at the lower end of Sushi O's available options ($16), my girlfriend ordered "Second Base" (oddly, this is absent from the restaurant's web site); the plate consisted of 3 rather diminutive rolls: 1 California roll, 1 Spicy Tuna roll, and 1 Vegan Roll. And as a woman who does NOT enjoy heavy spicing, my girlfriend inquired about substituting the included spicy tuna roll (individually priced at $6) for salmon ($4.50) but was told that there would be an additional charge of $2-3 for the downgrade substitution. Considering that the roll she desired was *cheaper* that the included roll, this seemed an unusual charge -- and she elected to keep the original setup.

When the sushi arrived, she noted that the rice was old and had become pasty, almost like half-dried Elmer's glue. As an explanation, I suppose the restaurant had held off on cooking additional rice that evening on account of the slow dining room; again, this is rather hard to excuse.

For my entree, I decided to order the chicken Teriyaki, priced at $16. The low-brow "sizzling" platter on which my meal arrived was reminiscent of the same one might find in an Applebee's or low-cost Mexican establishment, and was unexpected from a restaurant of Sushi O's presumed stature. Further flogging my senses and expectations was an obviously store-purchased 6-oz chicken breast fillet so horribly overcooked to the point of requiring a steak knife to consume. Also included were 5 broccoli florets and two carrot slivers, over which at least 12-oz of Teriyaki sauce was applied. It left the meal and my mind swimming: did I order soup?

Moreover, I was left searching for the value in our experience. The quiet dining area was appreciated, but the same attribute can be found elsewhere in Richmond, and in locations in which the wait staff is attentive and the food properly cooked. Portions seemed small, given the pricing, and not up to the "fine dining" taste Sushi O is apparently attempting to produce.

In the end, the capstone on the evening came at the conclusion of our meal, when our waitress presented a bill for my signature, along with a pen advertising another of Richmond's restaurants (Can Can). I can only assume that this gaff was a will-intended attempt attempt to do us a service by subtly inviting us to take our business elsewhere next time.

Indeed, we will.

Tuesday, April 7, 2009

Braised Balsamic Chicken


Braised Balsamic Chicken
Originally uploaded by phi1317

Since its been a while since I've created any new content, I thought I might write today about a meal that I created last night. Those of you who know me, also know that I enjoy cooking quite a bit.

In that respect, I've been on a "healthy cooking" kick of late, and have been rediscovering lots of foods that I enjoy, but in a healthier format. In this case, I combined the taste of balsamic vinegar, chicken, tomatoes and mushrooms with rosemay, basil, oregeno and thyme to create the entree meat. The "mashed potato" stand-in is actually organic cauliflower that has been steamed, then blended into a consistency very similar to that of mashed potatoes. The asparagus was also steamed, then topped with some of the chicken sauce.

In total, the meal comes out to 220C (including a side salad with dressing - not pictured) and I was FULL after eating this.

Wednesday, March 18, 2009

The Quest for a New Web Server (And 3-month Review of Krypt.com)

The long process of finding a new web host began back in December of 2008, and continues into March 2009.

My goal remains to cut my fixed costs associated with hosting my personal web sites and those of my family/friends. Note that I have not experienced a single problem with my dedicated server at ThePlanet, and they continue to provide excellent service -- I've retained their services as a "life boat" to which I can return in crisis while I search for a permanent solution. After a brief sojourn from their network from January 2009 until a few days ago, I'm back with thePlanet for the moment.

Prior to today, my blog web site was hosted on a virtual private server (VPS) from Krypt.com. As my readers may have noticed, service over the last few months was less than stellar (terrible, in fact), as I experienced a number of quite protracted and unexplained outages, during which my VPS was entirely unavailable/unresponsive to all web traffic and any administrative connection.

Indeed, even Krypt's own technicians were unable to restore the VPS during those outages and, at one point, arbitrarily (and with no warning whatsoever) assigned me to a new server with a new IP address, requiring that I scramble to update DNS settings across my web portfolio.

At the same time, they entirely deleted all my site materials and left me to re-configure the entire web server on the new VPS from scratch -- no setting or software was carried forward onto the server. Fortunately, I maintain an off-site backup, so restoration of site files was relatively simple, though re-configuring IIS was a bit of a pain and a waste of time. I completed the work, however, believing that my troubles were drawing to an end.

As it would turn out, my troubles with Krypt.com were not complete as the new VPS began to settle into the precisely identical pattern of unresponsiveness as its predecessor with Krypt. Only this time, I added documentation to my technical support requests at Krypt by sending in tracert outputs to demonstrate that the connectivity problems were not on my end as certain Krypt technicians had implied. Take note of the last network "hop" to my server and the associated ping times.
Tracing route to customer.vpls.net [98.126.15.X] over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 10.10.32.1

2 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 192.X.X.X

3 2 ms 2 ms 2 ms X.hsa1.X.level3.net [64.X.X.X]

4 2 ms 2 ms 2 ms ge-7-0-X.mpls1.X.level3.net [209.244.22.1]

5 * 6 ms 4 ms ae-2-0.bbr1.washington1.level3.net [4.68.128.201]

6 5 ms 6 ms 5 ms ae-24-79.car4.washington1.level3.net [4.68.17.70]

7 5 ms 5 ms 6 ms 10ge-3-1-0.was10.ip.tiscali.net [4.68.110.98]

8 70 ms 70 ms 69 ms so-4-0-0.lax10.ip.tiscali.net [89.149.187.93]

9 76 ms 74 ms 74 ms vpls-gw.ip.tiscali.net [77.67.68.98]

10 74 ms 74 ms 75 ms vlan2099.br1.lax3.vpls.net [67.198.200.18]

11 1353 ms 227 ms 383 ms customer.vpls.net [98.126.15.X]

Trace complete.

After supplying this documentation to Krypt.com, they were still unable to address the problem, though my opinion of the root cause had changed (to oversold servers and/or bandwidth). There is very little else which can explain the slow response in the last hop to my VPS -- that is, the most rational and most likely condition to create such a large spike in ping time in the last hop is a destination server overburdened with other client's applications and email (SPAM) servers.

Although my experience with Krypt's "quality" of service may not represent the VPS industry as a whole, I believe my server usage and technical requirements are such that a VPS environment will be unacceptable to me, regardless of the provider. So with that in mind, my mind is set to leave Krypt behind and continue my quest elsewhere, only using revised terms of search that now are revised and include only dedicated servers over which I will be master of my own.

I've already placed the order. More to come soon.

Labels: , , , ,

Thursday, February 19, 2009

Housing Bail Out.

Maybe I'm being a jerk for even thinking this way, but with all the talk of bank bail outs and now homeowner bail outs, I can't help but think: what of the the homeowners who have kept up with payments and weren't aggressive in pursuit of unaffordable properties and mortgages?

Frankly, I reject with extreme prejudice any notion that banks suckered home buyers into adjustable rate or other types of "exotic" mortgages.

When I purchased my house in 2007, I was offered these "deals" too but managed the foresight and financial maturity to recognize that down the road these offerings would pose problems for my personal finances. To that end, I selected a traditional 30-year mortgage, and found a great interest rate that has given me some stability in our current troubling economic times.

Now, was my decision somehow driven by an uncommon financial wisdom? Do I have peculiar powers of prognostication? Hell no. I'm just not stupid.

Yet, somehow we're now in a position where our federal government is going to swoop in and "make it all better" for people who were short sighted and irresponsible in their real estate transactions. At a minimum, that's how our President's presentation read to me yesterday.

Moreover, it at least feels that, as a responsible adult, I'm being asked to subsidize these failed and failing real estate dealings with my tax money.

Can someone explain to me why am I paying to support homeowners who accepted poor mortgage terms?

I'm sorry, but it isn't a requirement to own a property. I mean, if the banks aren't willing to offer decent mortgage terms, walk away and go find an apartment, townhouse or house to rent until you can find better offers. Nobody put a gun to my head and required me to sign on the dotted line at Wachovia; that's something I freely selected.

If a mortgage is something we must freely enter into on our own terms, then why am I paying to support a third-party homeowner who overreached his/her financial means by purchasing a home they never had any business owning?

Let's be frank here -- adjustable rate mortgages and interest-only mortgages were predominantly offered to buyers who either had low incomes to begin with or were preparing to purchase homes larger than their budgets could support. In both cases, it was the buyer's fault that they ultimately wound up in financial trouble.

Those buyers got greedy and accepted insolvency in favor of more house then they afford.

Granted, some of the blame does belong to the bank for allowing the transaction in the first place, and even more blame where the bank faked income records in order to have the mortgage approved. But I'm still not willing to fault the banks with more than a small portion of the blame. Its still an individual decision to enter-into a mortgage, and bad terms are recognizable.

These individuals should have known better.

Yes, you can be laid off from work. Yes, you can get hurt and not be able to work, or you may have medical expenses that make paying bills difficult. There are lots of reasons why a homeowner can fall behind on mortgage payments that are truly "no fault" issues. But more often than not, the stories being told are really about those homeowners who have mortgages resetting to higher rates along time lines they've long since known about. This is a risk those parties accepted.

So why am I, the responsible, mature tax-payer, supporting these people? I have my own problems, and I don't have the extra money to support someone else in their real estate idiocy.

I say we let them fall flat on their faces; let them deal with the consequences of their own actions, and (hopefully) learn from the experiences. The rest of us shouldn't have to "pass the hat" with our tax money, particularly when we have our own financial concerns, in order to bring solvency to a broken equation.